 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hy
| To: | Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hypervisor IPIs |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:14:02 +0100 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:14:49 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zUWDtt+ZioOloXTH8kUS+XQevYXASFPih/3wBxYMIwY=; b=ufgT+3wOQKMoFIVjqfLI5ZxYhuYzz9/Yybg/zPG9SmRb8a5yJw3VOKJ6UDXagvCgsU hpzfuhwy4iMThkSirm4c+Vhi2pe3DUF8d1O6+gi4Fhkb6N3NB4wvNebTWDjgCmL1NpLr axt1rsMzX6aO8W2o6DMeJQ8lZmShowl1oeAu0= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4E6886A3.3060402@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcxuB6ZAJHfenP5aDUy5ale3TMwq+Q== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hypervisor IPIs |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 |
On 08/09/2011 10:10, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Andrew: I think we have to leave this vector where it is, but you could add >> a comment explaining why it is so, in your cleanup patchset. >> >> -- Keir > > Wow I was having a slow day - I was thinking that > IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR was the first high priority vector. > > In which case it should probably stay at its current vector, but > FIRST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR should probably be bumped up, as it is no longer a > vector dynamically allocated to guests. Sounds reasonable. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make sure processor_pminfo initialized before use it, Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hypervisor IPIs, Andrew Cooper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hypervisor IPIs, Jan Beulich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
