WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: 4.0/4.1 requests

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: 4.0/4.1 requests
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:17:02 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:17:37 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IbupWc8vFRcT8bL5G9Fco2kII71DlksWBYM9SBOVe8M=; b=m97vsoEYh9mG/0FBVmSBUo1oomjdiJKqOHdzrZGfarP+LtWQ7aecVXflQO0eN/gg6p rayc7KoW1NLB89a9D0fEZhmP9skpim1uqLqSE5WjZtt0j22fYdPfUnQd/EOodT3yqCSu eyh/KNuRBdm7IlPZNBSzRZCQh4QDGUSr4m0QQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E68A4AC02000078000553F2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcxuEHNP7ry46kfcu0mDyN7TCTjlfw==
Thread-topic: 4.0/4.1 requests
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427
On 08/09/2011 10:19, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Keir,
> 
> without the old IO-APIC part addressed, I wonder whether we should
> really have the backport of 23805:7048810180de ("IRQ: manually EOI
> migrating line interrupts") in both trees.

It does fix a real bug. Perhaps Andrew could hack up a patch to make it
dependent on IO-APIC version?

> I'd also like you to add 23820:ba75234a6f56 ("bitmap_scnlistprintf()
> should always zero-terminate its output buffer") to 4.0 (I see it's
> already in 4.1), as this not being fixed confuses 'e' debug key output.

Ok.

 -- Keir

> Jan
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel