WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Paging and memory sharing for HVM guests

To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Paging and memory sharing for HVM guests
From: Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:04:14 +0000
Cc: Patrick Colp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Peace <Andrew.Peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:04:39 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MGZjZFSmeAEmPG6ezD4CVS2DsGoUT+Y34mmHaYcO29k=; b=Gpa6HgvpKNuEEGJSt91h2dymvU20KRVGKkcQ4MaBn2y9nXGjgCdug3/uyfWnCBGqGD bzDjfxTCsx4Tef160ytfrx+SjbYuieTYmzy3HlSBO6NzmHaBoUfMt8rLTBYKf1ADHRXx T6m0BNNaYqT2Z0xsc7zPelL8K8gutYvTIjhS4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=L3y/C74jRDkNmMkJe1/Z8kIwByaeTLv6/mXIP/u25XUcwkB44np2MH83K0g9O1dFZD otDzu9i3UAUwjBFS4G8Sp4I/rkFsut3UnpHOKXNhnwb6Rld1zrcpVJ5APy8kWj/tNbJA PlOo8njha9G7JKRaaX7DrABRpQ5IGnbD5J9cM=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <08af4aa1-9d9c-4662-9785-edbb958c294c@default>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <57d61b62-9a8e-49ee-b604-894310db2807@default> <08af4aa1-9d9c-4662-9785-edbb958c294c@default>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Live migration is something we've got on our to-check lists. There is
no reason why it shouldn't work properly (albeit slow if many pages
have been swapped out). We'll test and report back :). In the meantime
I vote against setting "no_migrate" on, if only because we'll get more
bug reports , even if it works for us.

Thanks
Gregor

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Dan Magenheimer
<dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Does live migration work (reliably) when pages have been
>> swapped out?
>
> Never got an answer on this.  If the answer is NO or
> not yet (and not likely in time for 4.0), I'd suggest
> that a domain that enables page sharing should also
> automagically turn on the "no_migrate" flag.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Magenheimer
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:20 AM
>> To: Grzegorz Milos; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Patrick
>> Colp; Andrew
>> Peace; Keir Fraser
>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Paging and memory sharing for HVM
>> guests
>>
>>
>> Does live migration work (reliably) when pages have been
>> swapped out?  IIRC, this is a limitation of VMware's
>> implementation (or at least was a limitation at one
>> point).
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Grzegorz Milos [mailto:gm281@xxxxxxxxx]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 4:15 PM
>> > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Patrick Colp; Andrew Peace; Keir
>> > Fraser
>> > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Paging and memory sharing for
>> HVM guests
>> >
>> >
>> > The series of 46 patches attached to this email contain the initial
>> > implementation of memory paging and sharing for Xen. Patrick Colp
>> > leads the work on the pager, and I am mostly responsible for memory
>> > sharing. We would be grateful for any comments/suggestions you might
>> > have. Individual patches are labeled with comments describing their
>> > purpose and a sign-off footnote. Of course we are happy to discuss
>> > them in more detail, as required. Assuming that there are no major
>> > objections against including them in the mainstream
>> xen-unstable tree,
>> > we would like to move future development to that tree.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Patrick & Gregor
>> >
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>