|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the uni
On 05/03/2009 10:13, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So it is entirely possible that MSI won't be used on an MSI-capable
>> function? Is this true of SR-IOV (virtual) functions too?
>
> Thinking more. One of the arguments surounding why 32 GSI is enough,
> is that systems with more functions than that can reasonably be
> expected to be using MSI. And thus will not actually use more than 32 GSI.
I think that is a reasonable assumption. But the fallback to GSI does need
to work, and I wonder why sharing of GSIs among passed-thru devices needs to
be absolutely disallowed? We'd have an easier time if it worked. ;-)
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Simon Horman
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Simon Horman
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Simon Horman
|
|
|
|
|