WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the uni

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:44:08 +0000
Cc: Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:44:55 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090305101258.GB18949@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcmdevrXeed7VsCVQ1uX7lP2vtC3oQAFRhgU
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
On 05/03/2009 10:13, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> So it is entirely possible that MSI won't be used on an MSI-capable
>> function?  Is this true of SR-IOV (virtual) functions too?
> 
> Thinking more. One of the arguments surounding why 32 GSI is enough,
> is that systems with more functions than that can reasonably be
> expected to be using MSI. And thus will not actually use more than 32 GSI.

I think that is a reasonable assumption. But the fallback to GSI does need
to work, and I wonder why sharing of GSIs among passed-thru devices needs to
be absolutely disallowed? We'd have an easier time if it worked. ;-)

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>