WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the uni

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:41:45 +1100
Cc: Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:42:13 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C5D54B3A.4354%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20090305090507.GB12961@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <C5D54B3A.4354%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 09:26:18AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 05/03/2009 09:05, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > * I have not accounted for MSI devices/functions at this time,
> >   but my understanding is that they don't need a GSI at all.
> >   So it should be just a matter of giving them a device
> >   and making sure nothing else uses it.
> 
> Depending on how critical your no-sharing-between-passthru-devices is, you
> might need to be careful with this. Just because a device is MSI-capable
> doesn't mean the guest OS will use it (I don't know how common that would be
> in practice though!) -- generally there will be a legacy INTx operation mode
> which you might want to consider allocating GSIs for. Just a point of
> information.

That is a very good point. I suspect that will mean that we need
to assume that INTx will be used and thus MSI won't be a special case.

-- 
Simon Horman
  VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
  H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/             W: www.valinux.co.jp/en


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel