|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the uni
On 05/03/2009 09:05, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * I have not accounted for MSI devices/functions at this time,
> but my understanding is that they don't need a GSI at all.
> So it should be just a matter of giving them a device
> and making sure nothing else uses it.
Depending on how critical your no-sharing-between-passthru-devices is, you
might need to be careful with this. Just because a device is MSI-capable
doesn't mean the guest OS will use it (I don't know how common that would be
in practice though!) -- generally there will be a legacy INTx operation mode
which you might want to consider allocating GSIs for. Just a point of
information.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Simon Horman
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Simon Horman
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough, Simon Horman
|
|
|
|
|