|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoring MSI/MSI
On 24/11/08 11:03, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With this patch, MSI/MSI-X capabilities and tables are saved in Dom0 when S3
> and restored when resume. Actually, this is also the approach that kernel
> takes. The only concern is that Dom0 should not touch MSI/MSI-X, they are
> owned by VMM itself. Maybe adding a hypercall to instruct Xen to do the
> saving/restoring is good. I wonder whether the reason is strong enough for
> adding a hypercall for such purpose.
>
> So Keir, maybe you can tell what is your prefer?
I think the approach in your patch is okay for now.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoring MSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Shan, Haitao
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes forsaving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes forsaving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes forsaving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Shan, Haitao
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes forsaving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes forsaving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Shan, Haitao
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3, Shan, Haitao
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoring MSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3,
Keir Fraser <=
|
|
|
|
|