| 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support
 
My interpretation of your implementation is that it causes hierarchal  
relationships (master/slave) between domains.  Every group has one  
master and the rest are slaves.  The fixed relationships puts  
implicit limits on the organization of domains.  (See http:// 
www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/94/HPL-94-104.html, for example)
 Since groups are applicable to more than just scheduling (domain  
disaggregation, convenient migration, efficient security policy,  
etc.), a more general mechanism would be preferable.
 I submitted something similar in the past (Feb 20, 2007).  If anyone  
is interested, I'd be glad to submit a fresh cut of my patches as an  
RFC.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Mike D. Day
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Keir Fraser
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 
  
  
  
 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support,
Chris B <=
 
 
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |