| 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support
 
On 14/12/07 13:35, "Mike D. Day" <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Not slowing down microbenchmarks is the least we should expect for
>> acceptance. The feature needs to earn its keep in the tree by demonstrating
>> superior performance or scalability in a situation we care about. Like for
>> HVM stub domains. :-)
> 
> Yes of course. But it also must not slow normal scheduling, which is
> the point of these benchmarks. As soon as the stub domain is ready for
> testing I'll start performance work on hvm domains.
Sounds good!
 K.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Mike D. Day
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support,
Keir Fraser <=
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 
  
  
  
 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |