| 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support
 
On 4/12/07 19:32, "Chris" <hap10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also, even though it's currently just used for accounting, group
> membership information is effectively attached to a single domain.
> Assuming I've read correctly, when the master domain goes away, so
> does the membership information.  That's probably OK for HVM stub
> domains, but what if the domains are peers as in the dom0
> disaggregation case or (thinking even further ahead) in the general
> domain decomposition case?
How would the disaggregated-dom0 domains be peers in anything other than a
conceptual boxes-on-a-powerpoint-slide sense?
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, (continued)
 
 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Chris B
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support, Samuel Thibault
 |  
  
 | 
    |