|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support
Hi Everybody,
On 23.05.2007, at 20:05, Jan Michael wrote:
The benchmark passed with the following outcome:
Time for one context switch via pipe: 8734 (8640 - 9575)
Time for one Copy-on-Write fault: 5898 (5814 - 8963)
Time to exec client once: 573046 (565921 - 615390)
Time for one fork/exit/wait: 347687 (345750 - 362250)
Time to send 4 MB from host: 55785000 (27069625 - 315191500)
Time for one int-0x80 syscall: 370 (370 - 403)
Time for one syscall via libc: 376 (376 - 377)
Time to walk linear 64 MB: 1790875 (1711750 - 3332875)
Time to walk random 64 MB: 2254500 (2246000 - 2266250)
Time for one outb PIO operation: 721 (717 - 733)
DISABLED pte-update: glibc version is too old
Time to read from disk (256 kB): 18810406 (14266718 - 24088906)
Time for one disk read: 56343 (38593 - 201718)
DISABLED vmcall: not a VT guest
DISABLED vmmcall: not an SVM guest
Time to send 4 MB between guests: 94326750 (79872250 - 729306500)
Time for inter-guest pingpong: 130316 (119722 - 186511)
Time to sendfile 4 MB between guests: 134768000 (86528000 - 417646000)
Time to receive 1000 1k UDPs between guests: 26010000 (23384000 -
66784000)
I didn't had anything to do with benchmarking in the past, and
especially not with virtualization benchmarks, so there are again
some questions related to the results of the benchmarking test:
1. What can I read out of every single value which is listed above?
Can you please give a short explenation?
2. What are the unit(s) of the measured values?
3. What is a good value and what is a bad value? On what does these
measures depend on - hardware or software or both?
4. If I get a certain value like this one: Time for one context
switch via pipe: 8734 (8640 - 9575). What can I do to improve/tune
the performance or the values?
5. I googled through the web to find any results to compare with
mine, but I couldn't find anything. Do you have some?
6. In the README file is said that virtbench contains "low level"
benchmarks. What do you consider as a "high level" benchmark?
Ok. Enough of my questions so far. If you answere these ones I'll may
be have more afterwards.
Thanks for your help,
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Jan Michael
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Rusty Russell
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Jan Michael
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Rusty Russell
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Jan Michael
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Rusty Russell
- [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Jan Michael
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Jan Michael
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support,
Jan Michael <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] virtbench now has xen support, Petersson, Mats
|
|
|
|
|