|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups
On 12/05/07 08:43 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
On 12/5/07 01:16, "Mike D. Day" <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I thought we decoded the instruction to be emulated in Xen (in the context
of the HVM domain, so current==hvm-domain) then packaged it up in a
shared-memory page and notified qemu-dm in dom0 via an event channel. To my
knowledge there's no special treatment of this event channel or of dom0: the
notification is treated just like any wake-up of any arbitrary domain.
Hi Keir, thanks for clarifying. Has anyone considered giving priority
to dom0 (or any domain) when a domU is blocking on completion of an
event being handled by dom0?
Mike
--
Mike D. Day
IBM LTC
Cell: 919 412-3900
Sametime: ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx AIM: ncmikeday Yahoo: ultra.runner
PGP key: http://www.ncultra.org/ncmike/pubkey.asc
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups,
Mike D. Day <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups - some microbenchmarks, Mike D. Day
|
|
|
|
|