|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups
On 11/05/07 22:22 +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
Hi, Mike
Then I have a question.
When your scheduler patch effects performance improvement?
(like improvement of various latency for Driver Domain etc.)
Sakai,
After these first patches get accepted I plan on implementing a
feature where one domain can tell the scheduler it would like to run
*after* a different domain in the same group.
Xen already does this for dom0, but we also think it will improve
performance for hvm domains when they use a stub domain for device
emulation.
Mike
--
Mike D. Day
IBM LTC
Cell: 919 412-3900
Sametime: ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx AIM: ncmikeday Yahoo: ultra.runner
PGP key: http://www.ncultra.org/ncmike/pubkey.asc
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups,
Mike D. Day <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups - some microbenchmarks, Mike D. Day
|
|
|
|
|