|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups
On 11/05/07 09:06 +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
Hi, Mike
I have one question about this issue.
Is there any performance improvement results are available?
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
Sakai,
I will perform some micro benchmarks with the patch and without, and
with grouped domains and no groups.
I expect there will be no performance benefit and no detriment.
Mike
--
Mike D. Day
IBM LTC
Cell: 919 412-3900
Sametime: ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx AIM: ncmikeday Yahoo: ultra.runner
PGP key: http://www.ncultra.org/ncmike/pubkey.asc
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups,
Mike D. Day <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
|
|
|
|
|