|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups
Hi, Mike
I am plan to do this from scheduler view not driver-domain view.
(but My plan is investigate Lucy's GbE(web server) problem only)
If just dom0 boost is needed,
attached patch is the first place to start this investigation.
(boost dom0 only)
And I think it should study dynamic (from fixed 30msec) dispatch,
(I plan to do this.)
before considering preemption.
c.f.
As for my scheduler issue,
weight for vcpu-pin problem(already posted this ML as RFC) is first priority.
dom0 tuning is secoond priority....
And my study is smp ia64 not up x86.
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
"Mike D. Day" <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Keir, thanks for clarifying. Has anyone considered giving priority
> to dom0 (or any domain) when a domU is blocking on completion of an
> event being handled by dom0?
boost_dom0only.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups,
Atsushi SAKAI <=
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups - some microbenchmarks, Mike D. Day
|
|
|
|
|