|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport
> Thanks, just fiddling. It'll be interesting to see what
> changes the PPC
> guys will need for this.
>
> Cheers!
> Rusty.
(I'm sure you meant PPC *and* ia64 ;*)
On just a quick skim, one thing to note:
IIRC from the summit, domain0 and driver domains for
neither PPC nor ia64 will have a p2m lookup table so
a p2m translation will require a hypercall. So
while virt_to_machine is cheap for domains on x86,
it is not on PPC and ia64. If HYPERVISOR_share can
take physical addresses instead of machine addresses
(with Xen doing the phys_to_machine part of the
translation), I think the code would work better
for PPC and ia64, as well as better hide the
virtual->physical->machine memory abstraction.
Dan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=
RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Yang, Fred
RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, King, Steven R
|
|
|
|
|