WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport

To: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport
From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 05:46:38 -0500
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:07:59 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060208103441.GD23407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1139110732.25090.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060208101241.GD30975@xxxxxxxxxx> <1139394238.19399.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060208103441.GD23407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: veillard@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:34:41PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:23:58PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > It's a bundle, so you should use:
> > 
> >     hg unbundle http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/xen/xen-share-2006-02-07.hg
> > 
> > (Note the updated version).
> 
> FWIW, you also need -u here, or at least 'hg update' after
> unbundling to actually see the changes, analogue to 'hg pull' vs. 'hg
> pull -u'.

  Without -u it fails complaining about no repo available, creating a fake
.hg directory it tries to add changesets but aborts with 
   'unknown base 6b1d39a5!'
Trying to add -u as suggested result in 
   'hg unbundle: option -u not recognized'
using mercurial-0.7

  The bundle doesn't seems able to fully provide a repo state, and without
a repo state it seems unable to unbundle the data. I think mercurial hates
me, probably because I still don't really understand how it works internally...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>