|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport
King, Steven R wrote:
Shared page LAN is much less secure than a real LAN. Any domain
attached to the shared page, i.e. in the LAN, can modify any frame "in
flight" on the page. Recipients have no confidence that the received
frame is actually what the sender sent.
yes, this discussion came up some time ago (I noticed it when i was
doing the Plan 9 port) and I think the conclusion was "yep, it's an
issue". I am not sure where it all went -- I have not yet started the
xen 3.0 port for plan 9.
ron
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, King, Steven R
- RE: [Xen-devel] [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport, King, Steven R
|
|
|
|
|