WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 Status update

On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:35:06PM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:

>  
> > >  http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~iap10/temp/xen-summit-2005-07.ppt
> > 
> > The slides show >4g in green, and i'm pretty sure that's not quite the
> 
> > case until we get bounce buffers or iommu working.
> 
> Keir checked some bounce buffer support in a while back
> (dma_map_single). It's largely untested, though.

I must have missed this. Unless there is something i'm needing to
enable, the problem i've been working on with dma being attempted to
high addresses still stands.

>  * Intel would get the standard s/w iommu working (just a case of
> ensuring we have a machine contiguous aperture beloe 4GB -- the Linux
> code currently uses the boot mem allocator rather than using
> alloc_coherent, so it will need a little tweaking)

Yeah, i haven't had much luck so far.

>  * AMD would test gart support. Should just work...
> 
> Since the vast majority of server platforms have hardware that is >4GB
> DMA capable, it might not actually be such a big deal in practice. The
> biggest pain is probably dumb SATA controllers. We definitely need more
> test coverage.

Right, i'm using a sata drive, it must be dumb.

sRp

-- 
Scott Parish
Signed-off-by: srparish@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel