On 07.09.2011 17:15, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Why did you post separate copies of this message to xen-api and
ovs-discuss, without even mentioning it in either copy? What is
the value of splintering discussion?
Hi Ben,
Sorry that was unintentional. I wasn't sure where was the best place to
post this, so
I first sent it to the openvswitch list but then sent it the xen list
too and forgot to
mention it.
For the details about the versions:
root@xen-blade13:~# ovs-vswitchd --version
ovs-vswitchd (Open vSwitch) 1.2.1+build0
Compiled Sep 6 2011 01:01:15
OpenFlow versions 0x1:0x1
It's the one from de debian unstable repository.
The kernel is Linux version 3.0.0-scxen-amd64 (root@xen-blade13) (gcc
version 4.6.1 (Debian 4.6.1-4) ) #2 SMP Fri Aug 5 08:12:00 CEST 2011
It's the 3.0.0 stock kernel with debian .config recompiled with a vga
fix patch for xen on running on debian unstable
root@xen-blade13:~# ovs-dpctl show
system@xapi0:
lookups: frags:0, hit:542619, missed:83504, lost:10
port 0: xapi0 (internal)
port 1: eth1
port 2: eth0
port 3: bond0 (internal)
system@xapi1:
lookups: frags:0, hit:1973235, missed:711045, lost:1416
port 0: xapi1 (internal)
port 1: xapi5 (internal)
port 2: xapi2 (internal)
port 3: xapi4 (internal)
port 4: eth2
port 5: eth3
port 6: bond1 (internal)
port 7: vif1.0
port 26: vif6.0
port 27: vif7.0
The conf.db looks quite huge, I don't know why. I've attached it to this
reply zipped.
conf.db.gz
Description: application/gzip
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
| 
Home