WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen

To: Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen
From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:03:25 -0700
Cc: John Haxby <john.haxby@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:05:10 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=v/LJeFybczLtclFTwpp8zQOMjLEquBqzQy+iSeWZL2A=; b=bFLFgsbXdj0r1yioln5dwtgkMuu21AoH9TxUFZFXf3GCPu9z9IMJnP4l6xC6tQGnE0 h/jf88GM2PXG/wwcTAaRKHsMfDJ/0aOaMUi5LPSI0jKlrvzhtEz6nUM9QXrYeYVDU5IX CsLNevTkHC+A01H1qwrDDYah2JFTrxeLkSRpk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=tJHQfFZQ6+SphhnK0TMAcg9d35tH0M0i0OWOKsxsGRriBnOYbATy9XTmPvRMD2RCg0 2eL3eUOgab+8iS3yFr4WPzj5jRtVp70cYUYAcrY4wMAVsMl5hrNzGV7GqoGCNBZuAmNr zNfNIA+0HZhvjpFWH2Lwb0lS+8VrER5/MljLI=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinBSNp7V2XBTsQ8R0aeYI6LOAoj1WrQOIA6qqYo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100609141406.GV17817@xxxxxxxxxxx> <B86F8BCEEED5184CA225E0CC10FF611648ABA9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100609142037.GW17817@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA17E9260A62@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin_Y3btM97lh2ZJh5O9yh6xYuYJee0PannlWumg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C10AD78.9010206@xxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTilKT69H5hLyvOF_X40C0eDlMhXf9QMaK16eSRH0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinBSNp7V2XBTsQ8R0aeYI6LOAoj1WrQOIA6qqYo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

> What makes the most sense is OEL6 will track RHEL6 and they'll go through
> the trouble of getting Xen in Dom0 since they now have 3 VM technologies
> surrounding Xen. However, they could just move all their management tools to
> KVM and dump Xen as well.

I find that unlikely so far.
I could imagine Oracle VM to be sucked into / dropped for Sun xVM Ops.
Oracle VM has a very neat Xen setup and a not exciting GUI, so it
would be a sensible move.

Flo

--
'Sie brauchen sich um Ihre Zukunft keine Gedanken zu machen'

Hasn't the Sun xVM Ops team already been moved to the Oracle Enterprise Manager Ops Center project? Since Sun xVM is Xen it would
make sense to merge these two technologies.

Grant McWilliams
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users