WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen

To: Frank Pikelner <Frank.Pikelner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:20:37 +0300
Cc: Steven Timm <timm@xxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:21:57 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B86F8BCEEED5184CA225E0CC10FF611648ABA9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100609141406.GV17817@xxxxxxxxxxx> <B86F8BCEEED5184CA225E0CC10FF611648ABA9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
>    One option may be to consider Fedora as they appear to be working to add
>    Xen back in the next release:
> 
>    [1]http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/61745
> 
>    There are also Oracle Linux and CentOS that may do something about
>    including Xen.
> 

Oracle is actively developing Xen.. especially pvops dom0 kernel.
And Oracle has their own Xen-based virtualization solution (Oracle VM).

-- Pasi

>    Frank
> 
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Pasi Kärkkäinen
>    Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 10:14 AM
>    To: Steven Timm
>    Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    Subject: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen
> 
>    On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:04:06AM -0500, Steven Timm wrote:
>    > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>    >
>    >> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:31:48AM -0500, Steven Timm wrote:
>    >>>
>    >>> Has anyone yet figured out what it would take to make Xen
>    >>> run on top of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 beta?
>    >>> We are heavily invested in Xen under RHEL5 (actually
>    >>> a redhat clone) distribution, but already the xen kernel
>    >>> they are shipping with update 4 and 5 is shaky and has bugs
>    >>> which they don't seem to be in a hurry to fix.
>    >>>
>    >>> Basically I am wondering if Redhat 6 is just going to
>    >>> have benign neglect and ignore Xen, or if there is going
>    >>> to be stuff built into the OS which actively mitigates
>    >>> against Xen in favor of KVM.
>    >>>
>    >>
>    >> RHEL6 won't have Xen dom0 capability.
>    >>
>    > Yes I know that.
>    > There was a time in the past when RHEL4 didn't have it
>    > either. In those days people did a lot of work to
>    > patch the Xen hypervisor into a kernel that looked a lot like
>    > the RedHat kernel and could run on top of RHEL4.  There were
>    > even RPMS of a pre-compiled kernel.  That's what I
>    > am trying to figure out.. are there enough people who
>    > are both locked into RedHat and committed to Xen that
>    > it would make sense to try some kind of effort like that again?
>    >
> 
>    Yep.. I'm sure people will make rpms of Xen and dom0 kernel for EL6.
> 
>    >
>    >> RHEL6 will run as Xen PV and HVM domUs though.
>    >> You can use RHEL5 Xen dom0 to run RHEL6 Xen PV guests.
>    >>
>    >> Or you can use Citrix Xenserver, or XCP to run RHEL6 guests.
>    >>
>    > Site OS baselines constrain what I can do in that regard.
>    > RedHat and derivatives (Scientific Linux) are only distros approved at
>    > my facility
>    > Unless someone comes up with a way to do an alternative
>    kernel/hypervisor
>    > that can run a dom0 in a RedHat OS environment (such as was the case in
>    > xen 3.0.2-> xen 3.0.4 days) , there will be a lot
>    > of us that are forced out of the Xen business, which is of
>    > course exactly RedHat's plan.  And there are a lot of apps I run
>    > where KVM just doesn't cut it yet either in terms of I/O throughput
>    > or in terms of reliability.
>    >
> 
>    Both Citrix XenServer and XCP are based on RHEL5 derivatives :)
> 
>    But yeah.. I'm pretty sure there will be thirdparty RPMs of Xen
>    hypervisor/tools
>    and dom0 kernel for RHEL6. Just like there is Xen 3.4 and 4.0 for EL5..
> 
>    -- Pasi
> 
>    > Steve Timm
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >> -- Pasi
>    >>
>    >>
>    >
>    > --
>    > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>    > Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
>    > timm@xxxxxxxx  [2]http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
>    > Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities,
>    > Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Assistant Group
>    Leader.
>    >
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    Xen-users mailing list
>    Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    [3]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/61745
>    2. http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
>    3. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users