WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Measure disk activity in full-virtualization.

To: "Alejandro Paredes" <aleparedes@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Measure disk activity in full-virtualization.
From: "Todd Deshane" <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:09:04 -0400
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:09:42 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Z1s4QArxf0xqb7Vsj5CWiLfveKyXWnIoyKjMojIlTPI=; b=hoUE9De6fXn70DKmGZj/cSCu38YJ1fePmAqe0zATSvOx+uaD9tnkX2gZikx2j5z863 AyzqA6yRLiWzgxKxDrsuZO1fUvAPY6geqS1OoecB8cqPxjmK041jytW9LqUdxnnnlQca h436CRgr8cEuskTzPg69UBQfF5EuaiFPJuUVc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:references; b=l//0dIU9PhUHYfJ2sWGM6XOpcDF4cwqZ4nM/1gWF3CWG1erZBvxUawnm//vDMQW+lo 1LAMe9t98b2XpbJgMYWgoj/K28TkXyvQShYZ0FfE2sCMyWp2z86IhEQXqtf1SkI/oWFT ItMrPoLE+4M39vPq8Poi/dPoy0U788U/ItxSQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <c8c57fc50807181230lf19cd2dmfef3db9eb92c1881@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c8c57fc50807181230lf19cd2dmfef3db9eb92c1881@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Alejandro,

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Alejandro Paredes <aleparedes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've been doing tests to compare the performance isolation between
para-virtualized and full-virtualized guests using Intel VT. First of
all we performed tests over 2 VM's (paravirtualized guest). Some bench
stressing memory and disk were done measured by xenmon and virt-top.
These two measure tools helped to determine CPU allocations, blocked
and waited times, and everything worked fine.

I think this is really interesting research. Can you give us some more insight into
your testing methodology?

Are you familiar with the work at Clarkson University regarding performance isolation?

http://clarkson.edu/~jnm/publications/isolation_ExpCS_FINALSUBMISSION.pdf
http://todddeshane.net/research/Xen_versus_KVM_20080623.pdf


Cheers,
Todd


--
Todd Deshane
http://todddeshane.net
check out our book: http://runningxen.com
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users