WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: pv_ops polish: config option & head file

To: "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: pv_ops polish: config option & head file
From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:19:04 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:19:23 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080314084609.GL22951%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7ktzjbqjfs.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080313124404.GA2687@saphi> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02E77732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080314084609.GL22951%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciFsN7xy3Irhi0zTVuPgayQlS18bAAAMcwg
Thread-topic: pv_ops polish: config option & head file
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 03:39:15PM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
>> Isaku:
>>      Targeting the patchset or git tree
>>
http://people.valinux.co.jp/~yamahata/xen-ia64/linux-2.6-xen-ia64.git/,
>> I got some questions:
> 
> Thank you for comments.
> 
> 
>> 1:   I saw some config options such as:
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_ALT
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_ENTRY
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_NOP_B_PATCH
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST
>> 
>>      I am not sure what is best, but seems we expose too much here,
>> and X86 just have one CONFIG_PARAVIRT. I suggest we can go mainly
>> using one especially we have strong reasons.
> 
> In fact I'm sorting them out right now as a part of pv_cpu_ops
> clean up.

Great!

> They are just historical leftovers.
> Presumably we'll have only CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST.
> (X86 has both CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST.
> Please make sure.)

Oh, Yes it is in latest tree now:)
> 
> 
>> 2: config file
>>      I saw you generated a new config file specifically for domU
>> (xen_domu_wip_defconfig), I am wondering is it is what Redhat want. I
>> think RH will only build one image for various machine including PV
>> guest in one release. So I suggest we remove the new config file
>> xen_domu_wip_defconfig, but put CONFIG_PARAVIRT into each existing
>> config files.
> 
> I put the file there because others may want to know my config.
> I haven't intended to push the file to the upstream. I should have
> written so in the commit log message.
> Hmm, I can also remove it and put my config somewhere else.
> Either way is okay because the file is just for other's convenience.
> Which do you prefer, removing it or updating the commit log?

Oh, either are OK, just make sure we are in same page. Pleae
keep this here. But we need to make sure generic_defconfig can include
Xen machine vector in current case. Some Makefile/source change 
is needed to include this, I think REDHAT use generic_defconfig.

Thx, eddie

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>