|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?
 
Hi Kayvan
Thanks for your work and sharing.
Can you repost the performance data for native/domU by using the same
format as this one?
That would be more clear.
Thanks,
Anthony
Kayvan Sylvan wrote:
> The overhead was calculated by taking the jobs/minute from the
> RE-AIM7 benchmark for the HVM guest and comparing it against the same
> measure when running on the native machine.  
> 
> Environment             Forks   Jobs/min
> --------------------------------
> native 2-cpu    31      4009.9
> xen HVM 2-cpu   31      3558.7
> 
> native 4-cpu    133     8009.4
> xen HVM 4-cpu   51      6854.3
> 
> native 8-cpu    81      15898.3
> xen HVM 8-cpu   81      12462.5
> 
> native 16-cpu   157     30840.2
> xen HVM 16-cpu  41      11308.0
> 
> If there is some better benchmark or measure that I can use, I would
> be happy to do it. 
> 
> I'm working on creating equivalent environments on a Montvale machine
> and on x86_64 for comparisons. 
> 
>                         ---Kayvan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:06 PM
> To: Kayvan Sylvan; Alex Williamson
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?
> 
> Hi, Kayvan
> 
>> For the Montecito chip, running the RE-AIM7 compute workload, we
>> have the following preliminary summary:
>> 
>> Native vs. Xen performace
>> ----------------------------------
>> At 2-CPU, the overhead was 13%.
>> At 4-CPU, the overhead was 17%
>> At 8-cpu, overhead was 28%
>> At 16-cpu, the overhead was 173%
> Interesting. But what does "overhaed was 173%" mean?
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Akio Takebe
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Akio Takebe
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?,
Xu, Anthony <=
 
    
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
 
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Joseph Szczypek
 - Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
 
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Tristan Gingold
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |