|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?
Hi, Kayvan
>For the Montecito chip, running the RE-AIM7 compute workload, we have the
>following preliminary summary:
>
>Native vs. Xen performace
>----------------------------------
>At 2-CPU, the overhead was 13%.
>At 4-CPU, the overhead was 17%
>At 8-cpu, overhead was 28%
>At 16-cpu, the overhead was 173%
Interesting. But what does "overhaed was 173%" mean?
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?,
Akio Takebe <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Joseph Szczypek
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Tristan Gingold
|
|
|
|
|