On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:45:01AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:12:47PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> We could do that, but I think we should do it on top of my patch. Ie.
> >> I think it's better to have a too large heap per default and then let
> >> the users reduce it rather than the other way round. What do you think?
> >
> > The default value won't matter so much as long as xenheap_megabytes option
> > is introduced, I think.
>
> I disagree, I think it's very important that the default value is safe,
> so users don't end up with strange error messages that they do not
> understand.
I agree that it is safe bet to increase the default value.
What I wanted to say is
I don't insist on the dafault value and I just hoped you to add
xenheap_megabytes support.
However you seem to dislike modifying/updating your patch.
It's okay. If you don't, someone else (probably me) will do.
thanks,
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|