Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] NODE_SHIFT

On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 17:21 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > 
> >    Doesn't supporting 256 nodes, but only 64 CPUs seem a little out of
> > balance?  I can't see making NODES_SHIFT more than about 6 with the
> > current NR_CPUS.  Are we ready to increase NR_CPUS too?  Thanks,
> 
> We offer memory-only blades in our systems :-)
> 
> I plan to bump up NR_CPUS too at some point, but if you prefer we can
> set NODES_SHIFT to 6 for now, but that just means you'll have to take
> another patch for it later.

   Ok, I'll go with 8 since since we know NR_CPUS set to 64 isn't going
to last us much longer.  Applied.  Thanks,

        Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] NODE_SHIFT, Jes Sorensen Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] NODE_SHIFT, Alex Williamson Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] NODE_SHIFT, Jes Sorensen Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] NODE_SHIFT, Alex Williamson <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Important: changes to upstream hg repos, Alex Williamson

Next by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH: remove debug code in vmx_ivt.S, Alex Williamson

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] NODE_SHIFT, Jes Sorensen

Next by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] [Q] about assign_domain_page_replace, Akio Takebe

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]