| 
         
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?
 
Takebe -- (Sorry, should I call you Akio or Takebe?)
Did you build and install from xen-ia64-unstable tip (cset 7734 or
greater)?
If so, could you again provide the recipe for building and installing
on RHEL4?  I would like to try again and some things have changed
(such as CONFIG_LOCALVERSION and the build process for domU) so I would
like to understand the exact steps you used successfully first.
Thank you!
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:11 AM
> To: Tristan Gingold; Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); 
> Yang, Fred; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?
> 
> Hi Tristan,
> 
> Great!!!
> I test your patch with xlilo on RHEL4.
> I confirmed Dom0 can be booted.
> 
> The following is my elilo.conf. :-)
> --------------------------
> image=vmlinux-2.6.12-xen0
>         label=xen
>         vmm=xen.gz
>         initrd=initrd-2.6.12-xen0.img
>         read-only
>         append="com2=115200,8n1 console=com2 sched=bvt maxcpus=1 -- 
> nomca nosmp console=tty0 console=ttyS1,115200,8n1 rhgb root=/dev/sda2"
>         
> --------------------------
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Akio Takebe
> 
> >Le Mercredi 16 Novembre 2005 22:36, Magenheimer, Dan (HP 
> Labs Fort Collins)
> > a 
> >馗rit :
> >> > Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> >> > > Once the xen4elilo patch got applied, this no longer worked
> >> > > for me.  It may have been my pilot error.
> >> >
> >> > The key descision is when to move to new elilo.efi for Xen to
> >> > take advantage of xen.gz loading.  We should all move forward
> >> > together to get the feature
> >> > -Fred
> >>
> >> Perhaps.  But there is not a patch on the table for
> >> support of compressed images yet, and there is one
> >> waiting for xlilo.  Since 3.0 is imminent, let's decide
> >> on the xlilo patch that is waiting.  If a compressed image
> >> patch is available and tested prior to 3.0 freeze,
> >> we can consider that one too.
> >Here is the change.
> >I have only tested it with the old elilo on my RHEL 3.
> >
> >Tristan.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Tristan Gingold <tristan.gingold@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------text/plain--------------------
> -----------
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 
> 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Yang, Fred
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Yang, Fred
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
 
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Tian, Kevin
 
  
 |  
  
 | 
    |