xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?
Takebe -- (Sorry, should I call you Akio or Takebe?)
Did you build and install from xen-ia64-unstable tip (cset 7734 or
greater)?
If so, could you again provide the recipe for building and installing
on RHEL4? I would like to try again and some things have changed
(such as CONFIG_LOCALVERSION and the build process for domU) so I would
like to understand the exact steps you used successfully first.
Thank you!
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:11 AM
> To: Tristan Gingold; Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins);
> Yang, Fred; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?
>
> Hi Tristan,
>
> Great!!!
> I test your patch with xlilo on RHEL4.
> I confirmed Dom0 can be booted.
>
> The following is my elilo.conf. :-)
> --------------------------
> image=vmlinux-2.6.12-xen0
> label=xen
> vmm=xen.gz
> initrd=initrd-2.6.12-xen0.img
> read-only
> append="com2=115200,8n1 console=com2 sched=bvt maxcpus=1 --
> nomca nosmp console=tty0 console=ttyS1,115200,8n1 rhgb root=/dev/sda2"
>
> --------------------------
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Akio Takebe
>
> >Le Mercredi 16 Novembre 2005 22:36, Magenheimer, Dan (HP
> Labs Fort Collins)
> > a
> >馗rit :
> >> > Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> >> > > Once the xen4elilo patch got applied, this no longer worked
> >> > > for me. It may have been my pilot error.
> >> >
> >> > The key descision is when to move to new elilo.efi for Xen to
> >> > take advantage of xen.gz loading. We should all move forward
> >> > together to get the feature
> >> > -Fred
> >>
> >> Perhaps. But there is not a patch on the table for
> >> support of compressed images yet, and there is one
> >> waiting for xlilo. Since 3.0 is imminent, let's decide
> >> on the xlilo patch that is waiting. If a compressed image
> >> patch is available and tested prior to 3.0 freeze,
> >> we can consider that one too.
> >Here is the change.
> >I have only tested it with the old elilo on my RHEL 3.
> >
> >Tristan.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Tristan Gingold <tristan.gingold@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------text/plain--------------------
> -----------
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Tian, Kevin
|
|
|