xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?
Hi Akio --
Thanks very much!
Are you using -sparse/arch/xen/configs/xen0_defconfig_ia64 or installing
a different config file to build dom0? I ask because xen0_defconfig_ia64
has no modules (no =m lines) and I am surprised that this works
for RHEL4.
Thanks,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:56 AM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins);
> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?
>
> Oops..
> I used my tools build patch befor make world.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Akio Takebe
>
> >Hi Dan,
> >
> >Plese call Akio. :-)
> >
> >I probably did the following step.
> >
> ># cd /root
> ># hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-ia64-unstable.hg
> ># cp /home/takebe/linux-2.6.12.tar.bz2 /root/xen-ia64-unstable.hg
> ># cd /root/xen-ia64-unstable.hg
> ># patch -p1 < /root/xen-xlilo.patch <-----Tristan's Patch
> ># make world
> ># make install-tools
> ># cp xen/xen.gz /boot/efi/efi/xen/
> ># cp linux-2.6.12-xen0/vmlinux /boot/efi/efi/xen/vmlinux-2.6.12-xen0
> ># cd linux-2.6.12-xen0
> ># make modules_install
> ># mkinitrd -f /boot/efi/efi/xen/initrd-2.6.12-xen0.img 2.6.12.6-xen0
> ># vi /boot/efi/efi/xen/elilo.conf
> > image=vmlinux-2.6.12-xen0
> > label=xen
> > vmm=xen.gz
> > initrd=initrd-2.6.12-xen0.img
> > read-only
> > append="com2=115200,8n1 console=com2 sched=bvt
> maxcpus=1
> >-- nomca nosmp console=tty0 console=ttyS1,115200,8n1 rhgb
> root=/dev/sda2"
> >
> ># reboot
> >and boot with /boot/efi/efi/xen/xlilo.efi
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >
> >Akio Takebe
> >
> >>Takebe -- (Sorry, should I call you Akio or Takebe?)
> >>
> >>Did you build and install from xen-ia64-unstable tip (cset 7734 or
> >>greater)?
> >>
> >>If so, could you again provide the recipe for building and
> installing
> >>on RHEL4? I would like to try again and some things have changed
> >>(such as CONFIG_LOCALVERSION and the build process for
> domU) so I would
> >>like to understand the exact steps you used successfully first.
> >>
> >>Thank you!
> >>Dan
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:11 AM
> >>> To: Tristan Gingold; Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins);
> >>> Yang, Fred; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now?
> Or post-3.0?
> >>>
> >>> Hi Tristan,
> >>>
> >>> Great!!!
> >>> I test your patch with xlilo on RHEL4.
> >>> I confirmed Dom0 can be booted.
> >>>
> >>> The following is my elilo.conf. :-)
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> image=vmlinux-2.6.12-xen0
> >>> label=xen
> >>> vmm=xen.gz
> >>> initrd=initrd-2.6.12-xen0.img
> >>> read-only
> >>> append="com2=115200,8n1 console=com2 sched=bvt
> maxcpus=1 --
> >>> nomca nosmp console=tty0 console=ttyS1,115200,8n1 rhgb
> root=/dev/sda2"
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Akio Takebe
> >>>
> >>> >Le Mercredi 16 Novembre 2005 22:36, Magenheimer, Dan (HP
> >>> Labs Fort Collins)
> >>> > a
> >>> >馗rit :
> >>> >> > Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> >>> >> > > Once the xen4elilo patch got applied, this no longer worked
> >>> >> > > for me. It may have been my pilot error.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > The key descision is when to move to new elilo.efi for Xen to
> >>> >> > take advantage of xen.gz loading. We should all move forward
> >>> >> > together to get the feature
> >>> >> > -Fred
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Perhaps. But there is not a patch on the table for
> >>> >> support of compressed images yet, and there is one
> >>> >> waiting for xlilo. Since 3.0 is imminent, let's decide
> >>> >> on the xlilo patch that is waiting. If a compressed image
> >>> >> patch is available and tested prior to 3.0 freeze,
> >>> >> we can consider that one too.
> >>> >Here is the change.
> >>> >I have only tested it with the old elilo on my RHEL 3.
> >>> >
> >>> >Tristan.
> >>> >
> >>> >Signed-off-by: Tristan Gingold <tristan.gingold@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >-------------------------------text/plain--------------------
> >>> -----------
> >>> >_______________________________________________
> >>> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >>> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
|
|
|