| 
         
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?
 
Two things to point out -
1. elilo.efi should only give warning message if you put "vmm=..."
entries at the end of elilo.conf.  So elilo.efi can continue to work on
elilo.conf entries for the native Linux even with "vmm=" in it.  
2. elilo.efi should continue to work on "image=xen.gz  initrd=xenolinux"
boot, but you can't take advantage of loading initrd as xlilo.efi.
Unless the startup code got changed.
-Fred
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> There has been various threads about attempts to boot
> Xen under RHEL4.  Because RHEL4 requires an initrd, a
> special version of elilo.efi is required.  This version
> called "xlilo" was included in the Xen/ia64 tree some
> time ago, along with a patch file (xen4elilo.patch)
> that is required to apply to Xen/ia64 for xlilo to work
> properly.
> 
> I have not applied this patch to the mainstream tree
> because, once this patch is applied to Xen/ia64:
> 
> 1) everyone will need to start booting xen with xlilo.efi
>    instead of elilo.efi.  xlilo.efi is backwards compatible
>    and the changes have been given to the elilo maintainer
>    so they will eventually get into the official elilo
>    release
> 2) everyone will need to change their elilo.conf file.
>    In existing elilo.conf files, image=xen and initrd=xenlinux.
>    In the new format, vmm=xen, image=xenlinux and initrd=initrd.
>    Elilo.conf files that contain vmm= will cause current
>    elilo.efi to fail even if just booting linux as elilo
>    parses the entire file.
> 
> Because of these changes, if we install the xen4elilo
> patch, everyone using Xen/ia64 will need to change their
> environment when they pull the changeset with the xen4elilo
> patch.  (The Cambridge Xen team calls this a "flag day".)
> 
> Should we do this now, before 3.0 goes out?  Or wait
> and do it post-3.0?  Comments please...
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?,
Yang, Fred <=
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Yang, Fred
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: Switch to xlilo now? Or post-3.0?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
  
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |