|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure 
| Tim! everyhting seems to work now. domu is working ok, all 4 nested kvm 
guests are running. 
only dmesg seems te complain about something
(XEN) vvmx.c:1205:d2 vmclear gpa 1920de000 != 000000018c829000
(XEN) vvmx.c:1205:d2 vmclear gpa 1920de000 != 000000018c829000
(XEN) vvmx.c:1205:d2 vmclear gpa 1920de000 != 00000001f9372000
(XEN) vvmx.c:1205:d2 vmclear gpa 1ec8f7000 != 00000001f9372000
(XEN) vvmx.c:1205:d2 vmclear gpa 1920de000 != 00000001ec8f7000
(XEN) vvmx.c:1205:d2 vmclear gpa 18c829000 != 00000001ec8f7000
(XEN) vvmx.c:1205:d2 vmclear gpa 1920de000 != 00000001ec8f7000
mfg,
Jeroen
Op 26-7-2011 16:21, Tim Deegan schreef:
 
At 15:33 +0200 on 26 Jul (1311694437), Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden wrote:
 
Tim, This improved a lot. the domu does not become in-responsive
anymore. However, all four l2 guest are started. but 2 out of 4 are
hanging/in-responsive after 30 to 60 seconds.
L1 domu (sles11sp1)
  ->  seems to be ok
L2-1 propetary OS, seems to be ok
L2-2 propetary OS, seems to be ok
l2-3 sles10sp3, hanging/in-responsive
l2-4 sles10sp3, hanging/in-responsive
no degug/error messages in dmesg.
 
Anything in the l1 dmesg?
I'm trying to repro with actual linux guests but I've found that
PXELINUX is hanging for me. :(  I'll have a look at that later if I can.
In the meantime I realised I didn't quite get the logic right in the
first patch; there's one case missing.  Can you please try this one?
Tim.
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure,
Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden <=
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |