| 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure
 
Eddie, Here my setup,
in short: HW ->    dom0 opensuse 11.4(xen-cs23728) ->   domU (HVM-sles11sp1) KVM 
->    4 time kvm guest
dom0
opensuse 11.4 x86
kernel 2.6.37.6-0.5-xen
xen: unstable cs 23728
- domu (HVM)
- sles11sp1
- mem: 8 GB
- vcpu: 4
- kvm
--domu guests
--1) qemu-kvm: propetary OS
--2) qemu-kvm: propetary OS
--3) qemu-kvm: SLES10SP3
--4) qemu-kvm: SLES10SP3
mfg,
Jeroen
Op 20-7-2011 15:44, Dong, Eddie schreef:
 
Hi Jeroen:
        What L1 guest do u use? Xen or KVM?
Thx, Eddie
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden [mailto:groen692@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:00 PM
To: Dong, Eddie
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tim Deegan;
Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability
exposure
Hi eddie, I use the same settings. however my setup becomes in-response
after start of the second nested kvm quest. were does that leave us?
Should I make some trace and sent it to you. I can give you access to my
system as well if you want. just give me your thoughts on how to move
forward.
mfg,
Jeroen.
Op 18-7-2011 17:41, Dong, Eddie schreef:
 
Jeroen:
        Sorry for later response.
        I did a double check locally, I was able to create 2 layer 2 guests. My
 
environment is L1 guest: 64 bits Linux 2.6.25 + KVM-76. One L2 guest is 32
bits Linux, another one is 64 bits guest.
 
        For layer 1 guest, I am setting:
hap=1
nestedhvm = 1
Thx, Eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling	and	capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling	and	capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Dong, Eddie
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure, Dong, Eddie
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability	exposure,
Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Tim Deegan
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability	exposure, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |