Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-u

To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 09:39:27 +0100
Cc:	Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 01:40:33 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc :message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=syEFlOXlye8NzoX52EgREKvwmieW3hmGkVwZ/9ydUSY=; b=iac7mzbIlSsyuSTNTU3v30oJAYIDAh6RjwgAm3QIr9tHLFoTHHkmxNTy7KM0VeZR+E Mzfu6lS8QL/6niE2APCgzJ2w0dveTpzjjZj62tNgb5Rc+HuDqVAIp+PbkuZuuIg13Fbu HJZnCl5AQ1LDSNv91hNFkDO1C1Y/Z22paOeGU=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Yax5yJiKGEbRr5k1LFIErOZqIPnNC7uUh6meVCBvmYYJLvR02ji9HEtiplyjTDHrls ftBnqBWsJX57mfcXSB8h7sKhc5sAZ3a2gVT+hXPuPKhVas1uTJBr+uE8jvIr8o8sKfV1 eErHoRfNTX5YcO0SMEVgQkihVwPYffUVVzw/I=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1305880090.20576.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcwWyW2aV9dVBqeugU2xn8exyNy7BA==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.29.0.110113

On 20/05/2011 09:28, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>  makes we wonder whether we
>> shouldn't simply turn of the unused-but-set-variable warning
>> altogether, or at least not have it be an error. Not the least
>> because I'm not sure it'd be nice to backport all of these changes
>> into older trees (which obviously would suffer mostly the same
>> problems when built with 4.6 or newer).
> 
> Perhaps we should do both -- take the fixes into unstable and disable
> the warning in 4.1?

We should just disable the warning. Job done, don't need to take the uglier
"fixes".

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable