Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29 of 45] gcc-4.6 compile fix: xen/arch/x

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29 of 45] gcc-4.6 compile fix: xen/arch/x86/cpu/i

To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29 of 45] gcc-4.6 compile fix: xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 09:38:50 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 01:39:39 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc :message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a9cObsjoNzMc4bmDjDkWvMMwDhu93rORpeK76+xvQGo=; b=TN0Nzq4C7wb1J9x/9CXTVdGI9m+SH+sNZK6grpEDCAo2O+gCETCV4UFPY7h7HSNNdo SORpLddCAPdrkef6lsMoxjX0u5dagtZTG9QqiuLuOVSsGW1p89vNziYUajiViCIuF8ga IluF0aBSjxwUZpK4c+7hhEydXAWz4WYOyvipM=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=G772ZPxght3nv7piOFY0lrBCJw9QlVt8/HSha1DZZGfVjcV1dzUgBzF6keXwBzfdmo VnOXLdb5oim0esEmGhigHobLyjD7piiyqjPxFvQ7sZUsNqhHiBkr59fiqar+VO7UwdSd fxZtJ/c7bKYWkKV7a2+yPYI4Z0iLE+hlqhJEA=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4DD63A9E0200007800042615@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcwWyVeNfY+RgOZQq0OxWO2JlG0f3w==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH 29 of 45] gcc-4.6 compile fix: xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.29.0.110113

On 20/05/2011 08:55, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> intel.c: In function 'set_cpuidmask':
>> intel.c:36:14: error: variable 'extra' set but not used
>> [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> 
> No, please don't push this - it was a mistake that "extra" wasn't
> used, and 
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-05/msg00753.html
> corrects this.

Ha, too late, that was one of the patches I cherry picked as a reasonable
cleanup. Your patch will have to reintroduce "extra".

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 4] xentrace [v2]: non-contiguous allocation of per-cpu buffer, Keir Fraser

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable, Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29 of 45] gcc-4.6 compile fix: xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c, Jan Beulich

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 30 of 45] gcc-4.6 compile fix: xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c, Olaf Hering

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29 of 45] gcc-4.6 compile fix: xen/arch/x86/cpu/i