| 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
 
Looks like I spoke too soon.  I have encountered additional failures even with 
the Stefano's patch in subsequent boots.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay, Allen M 
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:54 PM
To: 'Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk'
Cc: xen-devel
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
> Can I put a Tested-by on it from you?
Sure.  I have attached the Stefano's patch I used just to make sure that we are 
referring to the same patch.
I would also like to use 2.6.38.  What commands should I use to pull it?  It is 
not clear to me from readying pvops wiki page 
(http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps).
-----Original Message-----
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:29 PM
To: Kay, Allen M
Cc: xen-devel
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:46:13AM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> I just tried it and it can now boot successfully without the need for 
> dom0_mem=max:1024MB parameter.
Woot! Great.
> 
> Is the patch going to be checked into pvops tree?  It does not seems to be in 
> 2.6.32.27 dom0 pvops tree yet.
It is 2.6.38. Hadn't yet done it for 2.6.32 - let me spin up a patch for it.
Can I put a Tested-by on it from you?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:14 AM
> To: Kay, Allen M
> Cc: xen-devel
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
> 
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:41:30PM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> > I noticed one of my e820 entry is not page aligned:
> > 
> > > (XEN)  0000000000000000 - 000000000009bc00 (usable)
> > 
> > It might be similar to the problem reported by Michael Young in attached 
> > email.
> 
> Did you try their patch?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure,
Kay, Allen M <=
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Stefano Stabellini
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 
  
   
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |