xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
Looks like I spoke too soon. I have encountered additional failures even with
the Stefano's patch in subsequent boots.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay, Allen M
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:54 PM
To: 'Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk'
Cc: xen-devel
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
> Can I put a Tested-by on it from you?
Sure. I have attached the Stefano's patch I used just to make sure that we are
referring to the same patch.
I would also like to use 2.6.38. What commands should I use to pull it? It is
not clear to me from readying pvops wiki page
(http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps).
-----Original Message-----
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:29 PM
To: Kay, Allen M
Cc: xen-devel
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:46:13AM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> I just tried it and it can now boot successfully without the need for
> dom0_mem=max:1024MB parameter.
Woot! Great.
>
> Is the patch going to be checked into pvops tree? It does not seems to be in
> 2.6.32.27 dom0 pvops tree yet.
It is 2.6.38. Hadn't yet done it for 2.6.32 - let me spin up a patch for it.
Can I put a Tested-by on it from you?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:14 AM
> To: Kay, Allen M
> Cc: xen-devel
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:41:30PM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> > I noticed one of my e820 entry is not page aligned:
> >
> > > (XEN) 0000000000000000 - 000000000009bc00 (usable)
> >
> > It might be similar to the problem reported by Michael Young in attached
> > email.
>
> Did you try their patch?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure,
Kay, Allen M <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Stefano Stabellini
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
|
|
|