|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:49:52AM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> Looks like it translates to pin_pagetable_pfn. I have also attached the
> entire System.map file.
>
> ...
> ffffffff8100cce2 t pin_pagetable_pfn
> ffffffff8100cd1e t p2m_mid_mfn_init
Ok, then it probably is related to the issues we had with the P2M
or MFN list being incorrect... and your E820:
(XEN) Xen-e820 RAM map:
(XEN) 0000000000000000 - 000000000009bc00 (usable)
(XEN) 000000000009bc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000000100000 - 0000000020000000 (usable)
(XEN) 0000000020000000 - 0000000020200000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000020200000 - 0000000040000000 (usable)
(XEN) 0000000040000000 - 0000000040200000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000040200000 - 000000009acd3000 (usable)
(XEN) 000000009acd3000 - 000000009ad67000 (reserved)
(XEN) 000000009ad67000 - 000000009afe7000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN) 000000009afe7000 - 000000009afff000 (ACPI data)
(XEN) 000000009afff000 - 000000009b000000 (usable)
(XEN) 000000009b000000 - 000000009fa00000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000f8000000 - 00000000fc000000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fed10000 - 00000000fed14000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fed18000 - 00000000fed1a000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fed1c000 - 00000000fed20000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000ff980000 - 00000000ffc00000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000ffd80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000100000000 - 00000001de600000 (usable)
is like swiss-cheese with the RAM regions.
What machine is this and how can I get my hands on it?
Does it boot if you have 'dom0_mem=max:512MB' (it is important
to have the 'max' there)?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Stefano Stabellini
|
|
|
|
|