|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
 
I just tried it and it can now boot successfully without the need for 
dom0_mem=max:1024MB parameter.
Is the patch going to be checked into pvops tree?  It does not seems to be in 
2.6.32.27 dom0 pvops tree yet.
-----Original Message-----
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:14 AM
To: Kay, Allen M
Cc: xen-devel
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:41:30PM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> I noticed one of my e820 entry is not page aligned:
> 
> > (XEN)  0000000000000000 - 000000000009bc00 (usable)
> 
> It might be similar to the problem reported by Michael Young in attached 
> email.
Did you try their patch?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure,
Kay, Allen M <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Stefano Stabellini
 - RE: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Kay, Allen M
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 
  
  
  
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.27 dom0 + latest xen staging boot failure, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |