|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: minios: don't retrieve the address of void vari
To: |
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: minios: don't retrieve the address of void variable |
From: |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:39:59 +0100 |
Cc: |
Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:43:45 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<19756.34131.763123.271348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Mail-followup-to: |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
References: |
<1294420140.12018.82.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110107171644.GZ5820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1294421133.12018.95.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110107192940.GC5418@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19756.34131.763123.271348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Ian Jackson, le Tue 11 Jan 2011 16:29:07 +0000, a écrit :
> When you write
> Signed-off-by: me
> you are certifying that you personally know that the copyright status
> is good.
Mmm, that seems to have been clarified indeed. In the past I had mostly
understood
The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path.
And my signed-off-by was mostly to express that I have completely
checked the patch and give my formal approval on it for inclusion. My
former acked-by, as expressed: in SubmittingPatches: “is not as
formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker has at least
reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. [...] Acked-by: does
not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch.”, i.e. it
looked good to me without giving so formal approval.
> See the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1, below.
>
> I don't see how you, Samuel, can certify that for a patch written by
> Gianni.
Now that it's clearly stated in SubmittingPatches, I sure agree.
Samuel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|