WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] PVops domain 0 crash on NUMA system only Node==1 present

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PVops domain 0 crash on NUMA system only Node==1 present (Was: Re: Bug#603632: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Linux kernel 2.6.32/xen/amd64 booting fine on bare metal, but not as dom0 with Xen 4.0.1 (Dell R410))
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:52:57 +0000
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Vincent CARON <zerodeux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Caron <vcaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@xxxxxxxxx>, "603632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <603632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:54:24 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CF83606.6050904@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <20101115233253.11935.35707.reportbug@zerohal> <1290513067.31507.7699.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1290538327.9844.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1290550323.9844.85.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1290550726.9844.90.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1291333639.25131.48.camel@zerohal> <4CF83606.6050904@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 00:12 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> What about "numa=fake=1"?  I think that should force it to create a
> single NUMA node.

Is there any advantage to this vs numa=noacpi? Do they effectively end
up doing the same thing?

> IanC: it looks like passing a node id of "-1" is the correct way to
> say "I don't care". 

I thought so too but convinced myself from staring at the code that it
wouldn't work in this case -- I'll double check before I resubmit.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>