|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] PVops domain 0 crash on NUMA system only Node==1 present
To: |
Vincent Caron <vcaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] PVops domain 0 crash on NUMA system only Node==1 present (Was: Re: Bug#603632: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Linux kernel 2.6.32/xen/amd64 booting fine on bare metal, but not as dom0 with Xen 4.0.1 (Dell R410)) |
From: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:12:54 -0800 |
Cc: |
xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent CARON <zerodeux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@xxxxxxxxx>, "603632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <603632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:13:46 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<1291333639.25131.48.camel@zerohal> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<20101115233253.11935.35707.reportbug@zerohal> <1290513067.31507.7699.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1290538327.9844.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1290550323.9844.85.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1290550726.9844.90.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1291333639.25131.48.camel@zerohal> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
On 12/02/2010 03:47 PM, Vincent Caron wrote:
> It just happens that your kernel above (2.6.32-27+numa1) boots fine
> under hypervisor _when_ passed 'numa=noacpi'. Yeah !
>
> I then tried again with Debian Squeeze's latest 2.6.32-28, which
> crashes as -27 under hypervisor (and changelog show no xen or
> numa-related thingies). Then I added 'numa=noacpi', and it boots fine
> too. I got my 8 cores, networking, etc.
>
> Enclosed is the dmesg for the latter, Debian, kernel.
>
> Is the 'numa=noacpi' a "production acceptable" workaround ?
What about "numa=fake=1"? I think that should force it to create a
single NUMA node.
IanC: it looks like passing a node id of "-1" is the correct way to say
"I don't care".
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|