On 09/22/2010 05:55 PM, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> The interrputs file is attached. The server has 24 HVM domains
> runnning about 40 hours.
>
> Well, we may upgrade to the new kernel in the further, but currently
> we prefer the fix has least impact on our present server.
> So it is really nice of you if you could offer the sets of patches,
> also, it would be our fisrt choice.
Try cherry-picking:
8401e9b96f80f9c0128e7c8fc5a01abfabbfa021 xen: use percpu interrupts for
IPIs and VIRQs
66fd3052fec7e7c21a9d88ba1a03bc062f5fb53d xen: handle events as
edge-triggered
29a2e2a7bd19233c62461b104c69233f15ce99ec xen/apic: use handle_edge_irq
for pirq events
f61692642a2a2b83a52dd7e64619ba3bb29998af xen/pirq: do EOI properly for
pirq events
0672fb44a111dfb6386022071725c5b15c9de584 xen/events: change to using fasteoi
2789ef00cbe2cdb38deb30ee4085b88befadb1b0 xen: make pirq interrupts use
fasteoi
d0936845a856816af2af48ddf019366be68e96ba xen/evtchn: rename
enable/disable_dynirq -> unmask/mask_irq
c6a16a778f86699b339585ba5b9197035d77c40f xen/evtchn: rename
retrigger_dynirq -> irq
f4526f9a78ffb3d3fc9f81636c5b0357fc1beccd xen/evtchn: make pirq
enable/disable unmask/mask
43d8a5030a502074f3c4aafed4d6095ebd76067c xen/evtchn: pirq_eoi does unmask
cb23e8d58ca35b6f9e10e1ea5682bd61f2442ebd xen/evtchn: correction, pirq
hypercall does not unmask
2390c371ecd32d9f06e22871636185382bf70ab7 xen/events: use
PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_gmfn to get pirq need-EOI info
158d6550716687486000a828c601706b55322ad0 xen/pirq: use eoi as enable
d2ea486300ca6e207ba178a425fbd023b8621bb1 xen/pirq: use fasteoi for MSI too
f0d4a0552f03b52027fb2c7958a1cbbe210cf418 xen/apic: fix pirq_eoi_gmfn resume
> Later I will kick off the irqbalance disabled test in different
> servers, will keep you noticed.
Thanks,
J
>
> Thanks for your kindly assitance.
>
> > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:31:22 -0700
> > From: jeremy@xxxxxxxx
> > To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > CC: keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime
> >
> > On 09/21/2010 06:19 PM, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> > > Thanks for the details.
> > >
> > > Currently guest VM hang in our heavy IO stress test, (In detail, we
> > > have created more than 12 HVMS on our 16cores physical server,
> > > and each of HVM inside, iometer and ab regard as heavy IO periodically
> > > run). Guest hang shows up in 1 or 2 days. So the IO is very
> > > heavy, so as the interrupts, I think.
> >
> > What does /proc/interrupts look like?
> >
> > >
> > > According to the hang log, the domain blocked in _VPF_blocked_in_xen,
> > > indicates "x=1" in log file below, and that is port 1, 2. And
> > > all our HVM a re have PVdriver installed, one thing I am not clear
> > > right now is the IO event in these two ports. Does it only include
> > > "mouse, vga"event, or it also includes hard disk events? (If it has
> > > hard disk events included, the interrupt would be very heavy, right?
> > > and right now we have 4 physical CPU allocated to domain 0, is it
> > > appropriate ? )
> >
> > I'm not sure of the details of how qemu<->hvm interaction works, but it
> > was hangs in blkfront in PV domains which brought the lost event problem
> > to light. At the basic event channel level, they will both look the
> > same, and suffer from the same problems.
> >
> > >
> > > Anyway, I think I can have irqbalance disabled for a quick test.
> >
> > Thanks; that should confirm the diagnosis.
> >
> > > Meanwhile, I will spent some time on the patch merge.
> >
> > If you're not willing to go to t he current kernel, I can help you with
> > the minimal set of patches to backport.
> >
> > J
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home