xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: VM hung after running sometime
Hi Keir:
I spent more time on how event channel works. And now I know that event is bind to
irq with call of request_irq. When event is sent, the other side of the channel will run into
asm_do_IRQ->generic_handle_irq->generic_handle_irq_desc->handle_level_irq(
here it actually invokes desc->handle_irq, and for evtchn this is handle_level_irq).
I noticed that in handle_level_irq the event mask and pending is cleared.
Well I have one more analysis to be discussed.
Attached is the evtchn when a VM is hang in physical server. Domain 10 is hang.
We can see domain 10 CPU info on the bottem the log, its has flags = 4 which means
_VPF_blocked_in_xen.
(XEN) VCPU information and callbacks for domain 10: (XEN) VCPU0: CPU11 [has=F] flags=4 poll=0 upcall_pend = 00, upcall_mask = 00 dirty_cpus={} cpu_affinity={4-15} (XEN) paging assistance: shadowed 2-on-3 (XEN) No periodic timer (XEN) Notifying guest (virq 1, port 0, stat 0/-1/0) (XEN) VCPU1: CPU9 [has=T] flags=0 poll=0 upcall_pend = 00, upcall_mask = 00 dirty_cpus={9} cpu_affinity={4-15} (XEN) paging assistance: shadowed 2-on-3 (XEN) No periodic timer (XEN) Notifying guest (virq 1, port 0, stat 0/-1/0)
And its domain event info is :
(XEN) Domain 10 polling vCPUs: {No periodic timer} (XEN) Event channel information for domain 10: (XEN) port [p/m] (XEN) 1 [0/1]: s=3 n=0 d=0 p=105 x=1 (XEN) 2 [0/1]: s=3 n=1 d=0 p=106 x=1 (XEN) 3 [0/0]: s=3 n=0 d=0 p=104 x=0 (XEN) 4 [0/1]: s=2 n=0 d=0 x=0 (XEN) 5 [0/0]: s=6 n=0 x=0 (XEN) 6 [0/0]: s=2 n=0 d=0 x=0 (XEN) 7 [0/0]: s=3 n=0 d=0 p=107 x=0 (XEN) 8 [0/0]: s=3 n=0 d=0 p=108 x=0 (XEN) 9 [0/0]: s=3 n=0 d=0 p=109 x=0 (XEN) 10 [0/0]: s=3 n=0 d=0 p=110 x=0
Base on our situation, we only interest in the event channel which consumer_is_xen is 1,
and here "x=1", that is port 1 and 2. According to the log, the other side of the channel
is domain 0, port 105, and 106.
Take a look at domain 0 event channel with port 105,106, I find on port 105, it pending is
1.(in [1,0], first bit refer to pending, and is 1, second bit refer to mask, is 0).
(XEN) 105 [1/0]: s=3 n=2 d=10 p=1 x=0 (XEN) 106 [0/0]: s=3 n=2 d=10 p=2 x=0
In all, we have domain U cpu blocking on _VPF_blocked_in_xen, and it must set the pending bit.
Consider pending is 1, it looks like the irq is not triggered, am I right ?
Since if it is triggerred, it should clear the pending bit. (line 361).
------------------------------/linux-2.6-pvops.git/kernel/irq/chip.c---
354 void 355 handle_level_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) 356 { 357 struct irqaction *action; 358 irqreturn_t action_ret; 359 360 spin_lock(&desc->lock); 361 mask_ack_irq(desc, irq); 362 363 if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS)) 364 goto out_unlock; 365 desc->status &= ~(IRQ_REPLAY | IRQ_WAITING); 366 kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, desc); 367
BTW, the qemu still works fine when VM is hang. Below is it strace output.
No much difference between other well worked qemu instance, other than select all Timeout.
-------------------
select(14, [3 7 11 12 13], [], [], {0, 10000}) = 0 (Timeout) clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {673470, 59535265}) = 0 clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {673470, 59629728}) = 0 clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {673470, 59717700}) = 0 clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {673470, 59806552}) = 0 select(14, [3 7 11 12 13], [], [], {0, 10000}) = 0 (Timeout) clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {673470, 70234406}) = 0 clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {673470, 70332116}) = 0 clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {673470, 70419835}) = 0
> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:35:46 +0100 > Subject: Re: VM hung after running sometime > From: keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx > CC: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx > > On 20/09/2010 10:15, "MaoXiaoyun" <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Thanks Keir. > > > > You're right, after I deeply looked into the wait_on_xen_event_channel, it is > > smart enough > > to avoid the race I assumed. > > > > How about prepare_wait_on_xen_event_channel ? > > Currently Istill don't know when it will be invoked. > > Could enlighten me? > > As you can see it is called from hvm_send_assist_req(), hence it is called > whenever an ioreq is sent to qemu-dm. Note that it is called *before* > qemu-dm is notified -- hence it cannot race the wakeup from qemu, as we will > not get woken u
ntil qemu-dm has done the work, and it cannot start the work > until it is notified, and it is not notified until after > prepare_wait_on_xen_event_channel has been executed. > > -- Keir > > > > >> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:45:21 +0100 > >> Subject: Re: VM hung after running sometime > >> From: keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> CC: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> On 20/09/2010 07:00, "MaoXiaoyun" <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> When IO is not ready, domain U in VMEXIT->hvm_do_resume might invoke > >>> wait_on_xen_event_channel > >>> (where it is blocked in _VPF_blocked_in_xen). > >>> > >>> Here is my assumption of event missed. > >>> > >>> step 1: hvm_do_re
sume execute 260, and suppose p->state is STATE_IOREQ_READY > >>> or STATE_IOREQ_INPROCESS > >>> step 2: then in cpu_handle_ioreq is in line 547, it execute line 548 so > >>> quickly before hvm_do_resume execute line 270. > >>> Well, the event is missed. > >>> In other words, the _VPF_blocked_in_xen is cleared before it is actually > >>> setted, and Domian U who is blocked > >>> might never get unblocked, it this possible? > >> > >> Firstly, that code is very paranoid and it should never actually be the case > >> that we see STATE_IOREQ_READY or STATE_IOREQ_INPROCESS in hvm_do_resume(). > >> Secondly, even if you do, take a look at the implementation of > >> wait_on_xen_event_channel() -- it is smart enough to avoid the race you > >> mention. > >> > >> -- Keir > >&
gt; > >> > > > >
|
hang.txt
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- [Xen-devel] RE: VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: VM hung after running sometime, Zhang, Yang Z
- [Xen-devel] RE: VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- [Xen-devel] RE: VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: VM hung after running sometime,
MaoXiaoyun <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, wei song
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, wei song
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, MaoXiaoyun
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|