xen-devel
RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Wang, Winston L" <winston.l.wang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel? |
From: |
"Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:20:11 +0800 |
Accept-language: |
en-US |
Acceptlanguage: |
en-US |
Cc: |
xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, JBeulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 05:27:09 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4C8FF18F.9010607@xxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<H000006700083c21.1284499172.uhura.space.zz@MHS> <4C8FF18F.9010607@xxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
ActUWOr0Xt4LpzNGRQmzJEmLLp34FAAGa3lw |
Thread-topic: |
AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel? |
CC Winston, who has is working on the Xen ACPI stuff.
Regards
Ke
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [mailto:jeremy@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 6:05 AM
> To: Carsten Schiers
> Cc: JBeulich; xen-devel; Yu, Ke; Jiang, Yunhong
> Subject: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen
> 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?
>
> On 09/14/2010 02:19 PM, Carsten Schiers wrote:
> >> But in any case - the root cause is broken firmware.
> > Getting deeper into it. The faulty entries seems not to be the CPUxCST,
> > but CPUxIST
> > for CPU2 and up. For a reason I don't know, native booting the kernel
> > doesn't run
> > into this issue. I have managed to get a veeeeery detailed ACPI debug
> > output now
> > from the Xen/Dom0 kernel, will try to do the same with native booted
> > Kernel tomorrow.
> >
> > I know already that the natively booting kernel will also run through 4
> > CPUs, even
> > though my CPU has only 2 cores. So it must be something different. There
> > is special
> > code in the acpi driver section for xen in the pvops kernel...
> >
> > Jeremy, did you do it? Who could possibly help? I am not a real
> > specialist...
> >
> > Did not attached the log, in case anybody is interested...it's 31MB.
>
> I'm not really an expert on ACPI at all. I've cc:d some of the Intel
> folks who've been very helpful in contributing ACPI changes.
>
> J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, (continued)
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?,
Yu, Ke <=
- RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Wang, Winston L
- RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
- AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
- AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
- AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
|
|
|