xen-devel
AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Ke
Hi,
I am still trying to solve this issue.
> I'm really surprised you (they) get away with this on a native
kernel...
I think I now know. I found the BIOS option that causes the problem:
SpeedStep. The buggy table
is the description of the C-States. But there is a different behavior
between native and Xen.
See native here with acpi debug enabled:
[ 0.358790] Table [SSDT](id 000C) - 6 Objects with 0 Devices 4
Methods 0 Regions
[ 0.358793] nsload-0136 [10] ns_load_table : **** Completed
Table Method Parsing and Object Initialization
[ 0.358944] processor_throttling-1143 [00] processor_get_throttli:
pblk_address[0x00000810] duty_offset[1] duty_width[0]
[ 0.358952] processor_throttling-0893 [00] processor_get_fadt_inf: No
throttling states
[ 0.358959] processor_idle-0361 [00] processor_get_power_in: No _CST,
giving up
[ 0.358963] processor_idle-0317 [00] processor_get_power_in: C2
latency too large [101]
[ 0.358967] processor_idle-0325 [00] processor_get_power_in:
lvl2[0x00000000] lvl3[0x00000815]
[ 0.358972] processor_idle-0548 [00] processor_power_verify: latency
too large [1001]
No _CST, giving up, C2 too large (0x80000000, I guess), giving up. Xen
doesn't give up.
I did not manage to create the same with Xen, as it will not appear in
the serial log. It will show in dmesg, if it comes
up, but unfortunately, it will crash with SpeedStep enabled, but not
interpret SSDT1 if disabled, thus no information.
BR, Carsten.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?,
Carsten Schiers <=
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Yu, Ke
- RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Wang, Winston L
- RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
- AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
- AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
- AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
|
|
|