|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 	2.6.32.18/21  pvops 
 
>>> On 09.09.10 at 20:27, "Carsten Schiers" <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> and provided the output, just in case it is what you needed. I will for 
> sure need some time to understand that.
> Is the hypothesis that a) the BIOS is wrong, and b) Xen is checking more 
> extreme than bare metal, so we need to
> make the Xen Code a bit more relaxed (error message instead of crash)?
I think the underlying problem was pointed out before: The page table
accessor functions can't currently propagate errors, and hence
ioremap() can't be forced to fail if Xen refused a mapping. And then, as
I wrote in an earlier reply, the check for not trying to map RAM from
ioremap() is pretty pointless (and hence no help) currently for the Xen
case.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1	with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, (continued)
- Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1	with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Message not available
 - RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1	with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Wang, Winston L
 - RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1	with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
 - AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem,	was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
 - RE: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen	4.0.1 with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
 
- AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm /	Xen 4.0.1 with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jan Beulich
 - AW: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem,	was Xen BUG in mm /  Xen 4.0.1 with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
 
- RE: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm /	 Xen	4.0.1 with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
 
- RE: RE: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm /	 Xen	4.0.1 with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jiang, Yunhong
 
    
- Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1	with  2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 	2.6.32.18/21  pvops Kernel?,
Jan Beulich <=
 
 
AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops	Kernel?, Carsten Schiers
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |