| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen
|
To: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen |
|
From: |
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT) |
|
Cc: |
Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Don Dutile <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:52:00 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1007021810210.29110@kaball-desktop> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1006211456360.18470@kaball-desktop> <20100630175637.GC16488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007011111510.30135@kaball-desktop> <1411749d-666c-447d-bf05-954e2b4adf93@default> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007021132390.29110@kaball-desktop> <9d5fb841-26be-4ce1-b549-eb7f17f88e61@default alpine.DEB.2.00.1007021810210.29110@kaball-desktop> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> > Thanks for the thorough reply! Any reason that any of these
> > cannot or should not be back-ported to go into 4.0.1?
>
> They should be safe to backport, the only ones we should be extra
> careful are the TSC related patches, and you were the one to raise that
> complain :)
> If you have some spare time to test 21445 and 21339 on 4.0.1 to make
> sure that everything keeps working as expected, then we can safely
> apply them to xen 4.0 testing.
Thanks, yes, I was putting that task on my list and wasn't sure
what the full set of required changes were and if there were
interdependencies so that I could test on 4.0-testing instead
of on xen-unstable. (Depending on Keir's 4.0.1 schedule, I
might not get it done in time for 4.0.1 though.)
Dan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home