|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen
 
| 
To:  | 
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Wilk	<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:43:42 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	Don Dutile <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:45:54 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1007011111510.30135@kaball-desktop> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1006211456360.18470@kaball-desktop>	<20100630175637.GC16488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx	alpine.DEB.2.00.1007011111510.30135@kaball-desktop> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
 
 
Hi Stefano --
What versions of Xen are compatible with this series?
I.e. is 4.0 required?  Are all Xen-side changes in
official 4.0.0?  Or only in 4.0-testing (and therefore
will be in 4.0.1)?  Or only in xen-unstable?
If post-4.0.0 xen changes are necessary, could you point
out the changesets?
Thanks,
Dan
P.S. Sorry if I missed earlier discussion or documentation
on this... but if not otherwise documented, maybe the
info should be in the patch comment?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:39 AM
> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Cc: Fitzhardinge; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Stefano Stabellini; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Don Dutile; Sheng Yang
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of
> changes
> > > compared to the previous version follows:
> >
> > Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of
> > these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I
> am
> > reviewing and if I've missed one or what not.
> >
> > And in this first intro email state:
> >
> > Since v7 the following things have changed:
> >  - Konrad made some comments.
> >  - etc.
> >
> 
> Good point, I'll do that from now on.
> I am pretty sure that you are reviewing the latest version I sent.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |