[Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We're at an intermediate state in 4.1 NUMA implementation I would say. That
changeset can be revised as necessary in future patches, but I think it is
broadly correct in that it's adding the right kind of extra things to the
control interfaces. Since we have 6-9 months before 4.1 is released we don't
need panic about regressions just yet.

 -- Keir

On 12/04/2010 11:07, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Hi!
> 
> Changeset 21118 breaks NUMA on AMD Magny-Coure due to introduction of
> 'sockets_per_node'. On AMD Magny-Coure we have two nodes on one socket, hence
> the existence of that field member introduces a breake on design level.
> 
> Please revert changeset 21118 or rework the patch to get rid of this field
> member.
> 
> Christoph
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel