|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage
On 12/04/2010 14:14, "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'd hope that Xen could follow their lead on this rather
>> than forge new ground, which may result in an incompatible
>> implementation.
> Until c/s 21118 Xen was just fine, reporting 8 nodes, 4 sockets and 48
> cores. It is just this socket per node (which got removed some years
> ago), which is doing harm. (BTW: I already complained about that last
> year, when Nitin's patch first appeared on the ML).
Okay, well I will revert the patch if we reach no further consensus.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Christoph Egger
- [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Andre Przywara
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Kamble, Nitin A
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Andre Przywara
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage, Kamble, Nitin A
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend: make NUMA in xm info optional, Andre Przywara
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xend: make NUMA in xm info optional, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xend: make NUMA in xm info optional, Andre Przywara
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xend: make NUMA in xm info optional, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|